9 comments

  • RamblingCTO 1 minute ago
    > Every Go package in github.com/peterretief/yggstore, what it builds on, and the functions in each of its files. Tests are left out.

    it's a cool idea, but reads super sloppy, sorry. There is literally no effort in this.

  • tortela 3 minutes ago
    would be nice if there was a picture of the final result in the README.md
  • quibono 1 hour ago
    Possibly silly question, but is this aimed at Go repos only because of some structural reason, or because this was the author's intention?

    I can see this approach being useful across non-Go repositories too.

  • joe-esquibel 1 hour ago
    Whats the validation strategy that you used for this? I run a similar project and I found that golden repos were needed to prevent drift. Have you stress tested this to find any limits? I compared my go work to ctags and treesitter for proof of functions found and list precision and recall.
  • stigok 1 hour ago
    I like this! It would be great if it was a hosted solution where I could just add any repository to the URL, like https://pkg.go.dev/ does for the godocs.
  • baalimago 1 hour ago
    Interesting! It would be cool to see this as a cli tool to allow agents to efficiently inspect codebases
    • dmoose 45 minutes ago
      I took a bit different approach assuming that agents can use the language servers to get structure and just trying to keep them honest. With this in a hook a lot of stuff is caught quickly without wasting a lot of context. https://github.com/dmoose/gochecks
  • slantedview 1 hour ago
    This is really cool. I could see adding this alongside the godocs to my open source projects.
  • web-frank 6 minutes ago
    [dead]